Prof. Dr. Malte Helmert – Publications

Classical planning problems are defined using some specification language, such as PDDL. The domain expert defines action schemas, objects, the initial state, and the goal. One key aspect of PDDL is that the set of objects cannot be modified during plan execution. While this is fine in many domains, sometimes it makes modeling more complicated. This may impact the performance of planners, and it requires the domain expert to bound the number of required objects beforehand, which can be a challenge. We introduce an extension to the classical planning formalism, where action effects can create and remove objects. This problem is semi-decidable, but it becomes decidable if we can bound the number of objects in any given state, even though the state space is still infinite. On the practical side, we extend the Powerlifted planning system to support this PDDL extension. Our results show that this extension improves the performance of Powerlifted while supporting more natural PDDL models.

Correlation complexity is a measure of a planning task indicating how hard it is. The introducing work provides sufficient criteria to detect a correlation complexity of 2 on a planning task. It also introduced an example of a planning task with correlation complexity 3. In our work, we introduce a criterion to detect an arbitrary correlation complexity and extend the mentioned example to show with the new criterion that planning tasks with arbitrary correlation complexity exist.

Planning domains are an important notion, e.g. when it comes to restricting the input for generalized planning or learning approaches. However, domains as specified in PDDL cannot fully capture the intuitive understanding of a planning domain. We close this semantic gap and propose using PDDL axioms to characterize the (typically infinite) set of legal tasks of a domain. A minor extension makes it possible to express all properties that can be determined in polynomial time. We demonstrate the suitability of the approach on established domains from the International Planning Competition.

One of the strongest approaches for optimal classical planning is A* search with heuristics based on abstractions of the planning task. Abstraction heuristics are well studied in planning formalisms without conditional effects such as SAS+. However, conditional effects are crucial to model many planning tasks compactly. In this paper, we focus on factored tasks which allow a specific form of conditional effect, where effects on variable x can only depend on the value of x. We generalize projections, domain abstractions, Cartesian abstractions and the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement method to this formalism. While merge-and-shrink already covers factored task in theory, we provide an implementation that does so. In our experiments, we compare these abstraction-based heuristics to other heuristics supporting conditional effects, as well as symbolic search. On our new benchmark set of factored tasks, pattern database heuristics solve the most problems, followed by symbolic approaches on par with domain abstractions. The more general Cartesian and merge-and-shrink abstractions fall behind.

Classical planning considers a given task and searches for a plan to solve it. Some tasks are harder to solve than others. We can measure the “hardness” of a task with the novelty width and the correlation complexity. In this work, we compare these measures. Additionally, we introduce the river measure, a new measure that is based on potential heuristics and therefore similar to the correlation complexity but also comparable to the novelty width. We show that the river measure is upper bounded by the correlation complexity and by the novelty width +1. Furthermore, we show that we can convert a planning task with a polynomial blowup of the task size to ensure that a heuristic of dimension 2 exists that gives rise to backtrack-free search.

In this paper we study the computational complexity of several reasoning tasks centered around the bounded plan existence problem. We do this for standard classical planning and hierarchical task network (HTN) planning and each for a grounded and a lifted representation. Whereas bounded plan existence complexity is known for classical planning, it has not yet been studied for HTN planning. For plan verification, results were available for both formalisms except for the lifted HTN planning. We will present lower and upper bounds of the complexity of plan verification in lifted HTN planning and provide some new insights into its grounded counterpart, in which we show that verification is not just NP-complete in the general case, but already for a severely restricted special case. Finally, we show the complexity concerning verifying the optimality of a given plan and discuss its connection to the bounded plan existence problem.

Restricted Tasks (RT) are a special case of numeric planning characterized by numeric conditions that involve one numeric variable per formula and numeric effects that allow only the addition of constants. Despite this, RTs form an expressive class whose planning problem is undecidable. The restricted nature of RTs often makes problem modeling awkward and unnecessarily complicated. We show that this can be alleviated by compiling mathematical operations that are not natively supported into RTs using macro-like action sequences. With that, we can encode many features found in general numeric planning such as constant multiplication, addition of linear formulas, and integer division and residue. We demonstrate how our compilations can be used to capture challenging mathematical problems such as the (in)famous Collatz conjecture. Our approach additionally gives a simple undecidability proof for RTs, and the proof shows that the number of variables needed to construct an undecidable class of RTs is surprisingly low: two numeric and one propositional variable.

Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical planning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing abstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections, which are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and Cartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to compute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow more finegrained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency. Domain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between projections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the planning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics yet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using the CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain abstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian abstractions.

The computation of high-quality landmarks and orderings for heuristic state-space search is often prohibitively expensive to be performed in every generated state. Computing information only for the initial state and progressing it from every state to its successors is a successful alternative, exploited for example in classical planning by the LAMA planner. We propose a general framework for using landmarks in any kind of best-first search. Its core component, the progression function, uses orderings and search history to determine which landmarks must still be achieved. We show that the progression function that is used in LAMA infers invalid information in the presence of reasonable orderings. We define a sound progression function that allows to exploit reasonable orderings in cost-optimal planning and show empirically that our new progression function is beneficial both in satisficing and optimal planning.

Classical planning tasks are commonly described in a first-order language. However, most classical planners translate tasks by grounding them and then rewriting them into a propositional language. In recent years, the grounding step has become a larger bottleneck. In this work, we study how to improve it. We build on top of the most common grounder for planning tasks which uses Datalog to find all reachable atoms and actions. Inspired by recent progress in lifted planning, database theory, and algorithmics, we develop a new method to ground these Datalog programs. Our algorithm can ground more instances than the baseline, and most tasks it cannot ground are out of reach from any ground planner.

Cost-optimal planning is at the heart of planning research, with many existing planners that produce provably optimal solutions. While some applications pose additional restric- tions, such as producing shortest (in the number of actions) among the cost-optimal plans, standard cost-optimal planning does not provide such a guarantee. We discuss two possible approaches to produce provably the shortest among the cost- optimal plans, one corresponding to an instantiation of cost- algebraic A∗ , the other based on a cost transformation. We formally prove that the new cost-transformation method in- deed produces the shortest among the cost-optimal plans and empirically compare the performance of the approaches in different configurations.

The aim of the AIPlan4EU project is to make state-of-the-art planning technology easily accessible for real-world applications and to integrate planning as a service on the European AI-on-demand platform. At the very heart of the project is the development of a unified planning framework that permits to programmatically specify planning tasks and to interact with different planning engines through a common interface. The demo presents the AIPlan4EU vision for the unified planning framework and the current state of the development.

Since its invention in 1974, the Rubik’s Cube puzzle fascinates people of all ages. Its rules are simple: the player gets a scrambled cube and rotates the six faces until each face contains only stickers of one color. Nevertheless, finding a short sequence of rotations to solve the cube is hard. We present the first model of Rubik’s Cube for general problem solvers. To obtain a concise model, we require conditional effects. Furthermore, we extend counterexample-guided Cartesian abstraction refinement (CEGAR) to support factored effect tasks, a class of planning tasks with a specific kind of conditional effects which includes Rubik’s Cube. Finally, we evaluate how newer types of abstraction heuristics compare against pattern database (PDB) heuristics, the state-of-the-art for solving Rubik’s Cube. We find that PDBs still outperform the more general Cartesian and merge-and-shrink abstractions. However, in contrast to PDBs, Cartesian abstractions yield perfect heuristics up to a certain problem difficulty. These findings raise interesting questions for future research.

How can we train neural network (NN) heuristic functions for classical planning, using only states as the NN input? Prior work addressed this question by (a) per-instance imitation learning and/or (b) per-domain learning. The former limits the approach to instances small enough for training data generation, the latter to domains where the necessary knowledge generalizes across instances. Here we explore three methods for (a) that make training data generation scalable through bootstrapping and approximate value iteration. In particular, we introduce a new bootstrapping variant that estimates search effort instead of goal distance, which as we show converges to the perfect heuristic under idealized circumstances. We empirically compare these methods to (a) and (b), aligning three different NN heuristic function learning architectures for cross-comparison in an experiment of unprecedented breadth in this context. Key lessons are that our methods and imitation learning are highly complementary; that per-instance learning often yields stronger heuristics than per-domain learning; and the LAMA planner is still dominant but our methods outperform it in one benchmark domain.

While the unsolvability IPC sparked a multitude of planners proficient in detecting unsolvable planning tasks, there are gaps where concise unsolvability arguments are known but no existing planner can capture them without prohibitive computational effort. One such example is the sliding tiles puzzle, where solvability can be decided in polynomial time with a parity argument. We introduce separating functions, which can prove that one state is unreachable from another, and show under what conditions a potential function over any nonzero ring is a separating function. We prove that we can compactly encode these conditions for potential functions over features that are pairs, and show in which cases we can efficiently synthesize functions satisfying these conditions. We experimentally evaluate a domain-independent algorithm that successfully synthesizes such separating functions from PDDL representations of the sliding tiles puzzle, the Lights Out puzzle, and Peg Solitaire.

Potential functions are a general class of heuristics for classical planning. For satisficing planning, previous work suggested the use of descending and dead-end avoiding (DDA) potential heuristics, which solve planning tasks by backtrack-free search. In this work we study the complexity of devising DDA potential heuristics for classical planning tasks. We show that verifying or synthesizing DDA potential heuristics is PSPACE-complete, but suitable modifications of the DDA properties reduce the complexity of these problems to the first and second level of the polynomial hierarchy. We also discuss the implications of our results for other forms of heuristic synthesis in classical planning.

Heuristics for lifted planning are not yet as informed as the best heuristics for ground planning. Recent work introduced the idea of using Datalog programs to compute the additive heuristic over lifted tasks. Based on this work, we show how to compute the more informed FF heuristic in a lifted manner. We extend the Datalog program with executable annotations that can also be used to define other delete-relaxation heuristics. In our experiments, we show that a planner using the lifted FF implementation produces state-of-the-art results for lifted planners. It also reduces the gap to state-of-the-art ground planners in domains where grounding is feasible.

The merge-and-shrink framework has been introduced as a general approach for defining abstractions of large state spaces arising in domain-independent planning and related areas. The distinguishing characteristic of the merge-and-shrink approach is that it operates directly on the factored representation of state spaces, repeatedly modifying this representation through transformations such as shrinking (abstracting a factor of the representation), merging (combining two factors), label reduction (abstracting the way in which different factors interact), and pruning (removing states or transitions of a factor).

We provide a novel view of the merge-and-shrink framework as a "toolbox" or "algebra" of transformations on factored transition systems, with the construction of abstractions as only one possible application. For each transformation, we study desirable properties such as conservativeness (overapproximating the original transition system), inducedness (absence of spurious states and transitions), and refinability (reconstruction of paths in the original transition system from the transformed one). We provide the first complete characterizations of the conditions under which these desirable properties can be achieved. We also provide the first full formal account of factored mappings, the mechanism used within the merge-and-shrink framework to establish the relationship between states in the original and transformed factored transition system.

Unlike earlier attempts to develop a theory for merge-and-shrink, our approach is fully compositional: the properties of a sequence of transformations can be entirely understood by the properties of the individual transformations involved. This aspect is key to the use of merge-and-shrink as a general toolbox for transforming factored transition systems. New transformations can easily be added to our theory, with compositionality taking care of the seamless integration with the existing components. Similarly, new properties of transformations can be integrated into the theory by showing their compositionality and studying under which conditions they are satisfied by the building blocks of merge-and-shrink.

Landmarks of a planning task denote properties that must be satisfied by all plans. Existing landmark heuristics exploit that each landmark must be achieved at least once. However, if the orderings between the landmarks induce cyclic dependencies, one of the landmarks in each cycle must be achieved an additional time. We propose two novel heuristics for cost-optimal planning that consider cyclic dependencies between landmarks in addition to the cost for achieving all landmarks once. We show that our heuristics dominate the minimum hitting set solution over any set of landmarks as well as h + if all delete-relaxation landmarks are considered. An experimental evaluation on benchmarks from the International Planning Competition shows that exploiting cyclic dependencies can lead to improved heuristics.

Optimal cost partitioning can produce high quality heuristic estimates even from small abstractions. It can be computed with a linear program (LP) but the size of this LP often makes this impractical. Recent work used Lagrangian decomposition to speed up the computation. Here we use a different decomposition technique called Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition to tackle the problem. This gives new insights into optimal cost partitioning and has several advantages over Lagrangian decomposition: our method detects when a cost partition is optimal; it can deal with general cost functions; and it does not consider abstractions in the linear program that do not contribute to the heuristic value. We also show the advantage of the method empirically and investigate several improvements that are useful for all cost partitioning methods.

Recent research in classical planning has shown the importance of search techniques that operate directly on the lifted representation of the problem, particularly in domains where the ground representation is prohibitively large. In this paper, we show how to compute the additive and maximum heuristics from the lifted representation of a problem. We do this by adapting well-known reachability analysis techniques based on a Datalog formulation of the delete relaxation of the problem. Our adaptation allows us to obtain not only the desired heuristic value, but also other useful heuristic information such as helpful actions. Our empirical evaluation shows that our lifted version of the additive heuristic is competitive with its ground counterpart on most of the standard international competition benchmarks, and significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art lifted heuristic methods in the literature.

How can we train neural network (NN) heuristic functions for classical planning, using only states as the NN input? Prior work addressed this question by (a) supervised learning and/or (b) per-domain learning generalizing over problem instances. The former limits the approach to instances small enough for training data generation, the later to domains and instance distributions where the necessary knowledge generalizes across instances. Clearly, reinforcement learning (RL) on large instances can potentially avoid both difficulties. We explore this here in terms of three methods drawing on previous ideas relating to bootstrapping and approximate value iteration, including a new bootstrapping variant that estimates search effort instead of goal distance. We empirically compare these methods to (a) and (b), aligning three different NN heuristic function learning architectures for cross-comparison in an experiment of unprecedented breadth in this context. Key lessons from this experiment are that our methods and supervised learning are highly complementary; that per-instance learning often yields stronger heuristics than per-domain learning; and that LAMA is still dominant but is outperformed by our methods in one benchmark domain.

Saturated cost partitioning and post-hoc optimization are two powerful cost partitioning algorithms for optimal classical planning. The main idea of saturated cost partitioning is to give each considered heuristic only the fraction of remaining operator costs that it needs to prove its estimates. We show how to apply this idea to post-hoc optimization and obtain a heuristic that dominates the original both in theory and on the IPC benchmarks.

Optimal cost partitioning of classical planning heuristics has been shown to lead to excellent heuristic values but is often prohibitively expensive to compute. We analyze the application of Lagrangian decomposition, a classical tool in mathematical programming, to cost partitioning of operator-counting heuristics. This allows us to view the computation as an iterative process that can be seeded with any cost partitioning and that improves over time. In the case of non-negative cost partitioning of abstraction heuristics the computation reduces to independent shortest path problems and does not require an LP solver.

Cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining admissible heuristics. In this work, we extend this concept to merge-and-shrink (M&S) abstractions that may use labels that do not directly correspond to operators. We investigate how optimal and saturated cost partitioning (SCP) interact with M&S transformations and develop a method to compute SCPs during the computation of M&S. Experiments show that SCP significantly improves M&S on standard planning benchmarks.

While classical planning systems can usually detect if a task is unsolvable, only recent research introduced a way to verify such a claim. These methods have already been applied to a variety of explicit and symbolic search algorithms, but so far no planning technique based on SAT has been covered with them. We fill this gap by showing how property directed reachability can produce proofs while only minimally altering the framework by allowing to utilize certificates for unsolvable SAT queries within the proof. We additionally show that a variant of the algorithm that does not use SAT calls can produce proofs that fit into the existing framework without requiring any changes.

The standard PDDL language for classical planning uses several first-order features, such as schematic actions. Yet, most classical planners ground this first-order representation into a propositional one as a preprocessing step. While this simplifies the design of other parts of the planner, in several benchmarks the grounding process causes an exponential blowup that puts otherwise solvable tasks out of reach of the planners. In this work, we take a step towards planning with lifted representations. We tackle the successor generation task, a key operation in forward-search planning, directly on the lifted representation using well-known techniques from database theory. We show how computing the variable substitutions that make an action schema applicable in a given state is essentially a query evaluation problem. Interestingly, a large number of the action schemas in the standard benchmarks are acyclic conjunctive queries, for which query evaluation is tractable. Our empirical results show that our approach is competitive with the standard (grounded) successor generation techniques in a few domains and outperforms them on benchmarks where grounding is challenging or infeasible.

Counterexample-guided Cartesian abstraction refinement has been shown to yield informative heuristics for optimal classical planning. The algorithm iteratively finds an abstract solution and uses it to decide how to refine the abstraction. Since the abstraction grows in each step, finding solutions is the main bottleneck of the refinement loop. We cast the refinements as an incremental search problem and show that this drastically reduces the time for computing abstractions.

Informed heuristics are essential for the success of heuristic search algorithms. But, it is difficult to develop a new heuristic which is informed on various tasks. Instead, we propose a framework that trains a neural network as heuristic for the tasks it is supposed to solve. We present two reinforcement learning approaches to learn heuristics for fixed state spaces and fixed goals. Our first approach uses approximate value iteration, our second approach uses searches to generate training data. We show that in some domains our approaches outperform previous work, and we point out potentials for future improvements.

Neural networks (NN) have been shown to be powerful state-value predictors in several complex games. Can similar successes be achieved in classical planning? Towards a systematic exploration of that question, we contribute a study of hyperparameter space in the most canonical setup: input = state, feed-forward NN, supervised learning, generalization only over initial state. We investigate a broad range of hyperparameters pertaining to NN design and training. We evaluate these techniques through their use as heuristic functions in Fast Downward. The results on IPC benchmarks show that highly competitive heuristics can be learned, yielding substantially smaller search spaces than standard techniques on some do- mains. But the heuristic functions are costly to evaluate, and the range of domains where useful heuristics are learned is limited. Our study provides the basis for further research improving on current weaknesses.

Stubborn sets are an optimality-preserving pruning technique for factored state-space search, for example in classical planning. Their applicability is limited by their computational overhead. We describe a new algorithm for computing stubborn sets that is based on the state variables of the state space, while previous algorithms are based on its actions. Typical factored state spaces tend to have far fewer state variables than actions, and therefore our new algorithm is much more efficient than the previous state of the art, making stubborn sets a viable technique in many cases where they previously were not.

Budgeted Tree Search (BTS), a variant of Iterative Budgeted Exponential Search, is a new algorithm that has the same performance as IDA* on problems where the search layers grow exponentially, but has far better performance than IDA* in other cases where IDA* fails. The goal of this paper is to provide a detailed guide to BTS with worked examples to make the algorithm more accessible to practitioners in heuristic search.

Cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining a set of admissible heuristic estimators by distributing operator costs among the heuristics. Computing an optimal cost partitioning, i.e., the operator cost distribution that maximizes the heuristic value, is often prohibitively expensive to compute. Saturated cost partitioning is an alternative that is much faster to compute and has been shown to yield high-quality heuristics. However, its greedy nature makes it highly susceptible to the order in which the heuristics are considered. We propose a greedy algorithm to generate orders and show how to use hill-climbing search to optimize a given order. Combining both techniques leads to significantly better heuristic estimates than using the best random order that is generated in the same time. Since there is often no single order that gives good guidance on the whole state space, we use the maximum of multiple orders as a heuristic that is significantly better informed than any single-order heuristic, especially when we actively search for a set of diverse orders.

We tackle two long-standing problems related to re-expansions in heuristic search algorithms. For graph search, A* can require Ω(2^n) expansions, where n is the number of states within the final f bound. Existing algorithms that address this problem like B and B' improve this bound to Ω(n^2). For tree search, IDA* can also require Ω(n^2) expansions. We describe a new algorithmic framework that iteratively controls an expansion budget and solution cost limit, giving rise to new graph and tree search algorithms for which the number of expansions is O(n log C*), where C* is the optimal solution cost. Our experiments show that the new algorithms are robust in scenarios where existing algorithms fail. In the case of tree search, our new algorithms have no overhead over IDA* in scenarios to which IDA* is well suited and can therefore be recommended as a general replacement for IDA*.

We describe a new algorithm for generating pattern collections for pattern database heuristics in optimal classical planning. The algorithm uses the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) principle to guide the pattern selection process. Our experimental evaluation shows that a single run of the CEGAR algorithm can compute informative pattern collections in a fairly short time. Using multiple CEGAR algorithm runs, we can compute much larger pattern collections, still in shorter time than existing approaches, which leads to a planner that outperforms the state-of-the-art pattern selection methods by a significant margin.

Optimal cost partitioning of classical planning heuristics has been shown to lead to excellent heuristic values but is often prohibitively expensive to compute. Lagrangian decomposition and Lagrangian relaxation are classical tools in mathematical programming that apply to optimization problems with a special block structure. We analyze the application of Lagrangian decomposition to cost partitioning in the context of operator-counting heuristics and interpret Lagrangian multipliers as cost functions for the combined heuristics. This allows us to view the computation of an optimal cost partitioning as an iterative process that can be seeded with any cost partitioning and improves over time. We derive an any-time algorithm to compute an optimal non-negative cost partitioning of abstraction heuristics without involving an LP solver. In each iteration, the computation reduces to independent shortest path problems in all abstractions. Finally, we discuss the extension to general cost functions.

Cost partitioning is a method for admissibly adding multiple heuristics for state-space search. Saturated cost partitioning considers the given heuristics in sequence, assigning to each heuristic the minimum fraction of remaining costs that it needs to preserve its estimates for all states. We generalize saturated cost partitioning by allowing to preserve the heuristic values of only a subset of states and show that this often leads to stronger heuristics.

The desire for persistent autonomy in ambitious robotic space missions has seen renewed interest in the use of on-board planning. This poses particular challenges in terms of the limited computational power of radiation-hardened hardware, and also the need to integrate with functions external to the planner itself. In this paper, we discuss the development of a forward-chaining temporal planner for use in this setting. We present results illustrating its lightweight resource footprint compared to contemporary planners, and its application to two proposed robotic space scenarios.

We study the impact of tie-breaking on the behavior of greedy best-first search with a fixed state space and fixed heuristic. We prove that it is NP-complete to determine the number of states that need to be expanded by greedy best-first search in the best case or in the worst case. However, the best- and worst-case behavior can be computed in polynomial time for undirected state spaces. We perform computational experiments on benchmark tasks from the International Planning Competitions that compare the best and worst cases of greedy best-first search to FIFO, LIFO and random tie-breaking. The experiments demonstrate the importance of tie-breaking in greedy best-first search.

If a planning system outputs a solution for a given problem, it is simple to verify that the solution is valid. However, if a planner claims that a task is unsolvable, we currently have no choice but to trust the planner blindly. We propose a sound and complete class of certificates of unsolvability, which can be verified efficiently by an independent program. To highlight their practical use, we show how these certificates can be generated for a wide range of state-of-the-art planning techniques with only polynomial overhead for the planner.

A classical result in optimal search shows that A* with an admissible and consistent heuristic expands every state whose f-value is below the optimal solution cost and no state whose f-value is above the optimal solution cost. For satisficing search algorithms, a similarly clear understanding is currently lacking. We examine the search behavior of greedy best-first search (GBFS) in order to make progress towards such an understanding.

Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) is a method for incrementally computing abstractions of transition systems. We propose a CEGAR algorithm for computing abstraction heuristics for optimal classical planning. Starting from a coarse abstraction of the planning task, we iteratively compute an optimal abstract solution, check if and why it fails for the concrete planning task and refine the abstraction so that the same failure cannot occur in future iterations. A key ingredient of our approach is a novel class of abstractions for classical planning tasks that admits efficient and very fine-grained refinement. Since a single abstraction usually cannot capture enough details of the planning task, we also introduce two methods for producing diverse sets of heuristics within this framework, one based on goal atoms, the other based on landmarks. In order to sum their heuristic estimates admissibly we introduce a new cost partitioning algorithm called saturated cost partitioning. We show that the resulting heuristics outperform other state-of-the-art abstraction heuristics in many benchmark domains.

While traditionally classical planning concentrated on finding plans for solvable tasks, detecting unsolvable instances has recently attracted increasing interest. To preclude wrong results, it is desirable that the planning system provides a certificate of unsolvability that can be independently verified. We propose a rule-based proof system for unsolvability where a proof establishes a knowledge base of verifiable basic statements and applies a set of derivation rules to infer the unsolvability of the task from these statements. We argue that this approach is more flexible than a recent proposal of inductive certificates of unsolvability and show how our proof system can be used for a wide range of planning techniques.

The European Robotic Goal-Oriented Autonomous Controller ERGO (http://www.h2020-ergo.eu/) is one of the six space robotic projects in the frame of the PERASPERA SRC (http://www.h2020-peraspera.eu/). Its goal is to provide an Autonomy Framework capable of operating at different levels of autonomy, from tele- operations to full on-board autonomy. Even though it has been originally conceived for space robotics, its domain independent design facilitates its application to any terrestrial robotic system. This paper presents the approach followed, current status and future steps.

The plans that planning systems generate for solvable planning tasks are routinely verified by independent validation tools. For unsolvable planning tasks, no such validation capabilities currently exist. We describe a family of certificates of unsolvability for classical planning tasks that can be efficiently verified and are sufficiently general for a wide range of planning approaches including heuristic search with delete relaxation, critical-path, pattern database and linear merge-and-shrink heuristics, symbolic search with binary decision diagrams, and the Trapper algorithm for detecting dead ends. We also augmented a classical planning system with the ability to emit certificates of unsolvability and implemented a planner-independent certificate validation tool. Experiments show that the overhead for producing such certificates is tolerable and that their validation is practically feasible.

Cost partitioning is a well-known technique to make admissible heuristics for classical planning additive. The optimal cost partitioning of explicit-state abstraction heuristics can be computed in polynomial time with a linear program, but the size of the model is often prohibitive. We study this model from a dual perspective and develop several simplification rules to reduce its size. We use these rules to answer open questions about extensions of the state equation heuristic and their relation to cost partitioning.

Cost partitioning is a general and principled approach for constructing additive admissible heuristics for state-space search. Cost partitioning approaches for optimal classical planning include optimal cost partitioning, uniform cost partitioning, zero-one cost partitioning, saturated cost partitioning, post-hoc optimization and the canonical heuristic for pattern databases. We compare these algorithms theoretically, showing that saturated cost partitioning dominates greedy zero-one cost partitioning. As a side effect of our analysis, we obtain a new cost partitioning algorithm dominating uniform cost partitioning. We also evaluate these algorithms experimentally on pattern databases, Cartesian abstractions and landmark heuristics, showing that saturated cost partitioning is usually the method of choice on the IPC benchmark suite.

Symmetry-based state space pruning techniques have proved to greatly improve heuristic search based classical planners. Similarly, abstraction heuristics in general and pattern databases in particular are key ingredients of such planners. However, only little work has dealt with how the abstraction heuristics behave under symmetries. In this work, we investigate the symmetry properties of the popular canonical pattern databases heuristic. Exploiting structural symmetries, we strengthen the canonical pattern databases by adding symmetric pattern databases, making the resulting heuristic invariant under structural symmetry, thus making it especially attractive for symmetry-based pruning search methods. Further, we prove that this heuristic is at least as informative as using symmetric lookups over the original heuristic. An experimental evaluation confirms these theoretical results.

Pattern databases are among the strongest known heuristics for many classical search benchmarks such as sliding-tile puzzles, the 4-peg Towers of Hanoi puzzles, Rubik's Cube, and TopSpin. Min-compression is a generally applicable technique for augmenting pattern database heuristics that has led to marked experimental improvements in some settings, while being ineffective in others. We provide a theoretical explanation for these experimental phenomena by studying the interaction between the ranking function used to order abstract states in a pattern database, the compression scheme used to abstract states, and the dependencies between state variables in the problem representation.

Symmetry-based state space pruning techniques have proved to greatly improve heuristic search based classical planners. Similarly, abstraction heuristics in general and pattern databases in particular are key ingredients of such planners. However, only little work has dealt with how the abstraction heuristics behave under symmetries. In this work, we investigate the symmetry properties of the popular canonical pattern databases heuristic. Exploiting structural symmetries, we strengthen the canonical pattern databases by adding symmetric pattern databases, making the resulting heuristic invariant under structural symmetry, thus making it especially attractive for symmetry-based pruning search methods. Further, we prove that this heuristic is at least as informative as using symmetric lookups over the original heuristic. An experimental evaluation confirms these theoretical results.

A classical result in optimal search shows that A* with an admissible and consistent heuristic expands every state whose f-value is below the optimal solution cost and no state whose f-value is above the optimal solution cost. For satisficing search algorithms, a similarly clear understanding is currently lacking. We examine the search behaviour of greedy best-first search (GBFS) in order to make progress towards such an understanding. We introduce the concept of high-water mark benches, which separate the search space into areas that are searched by a GBFS algorithm in sequence. High-water mark benches allow us to exactly determine the set of states that are not expanded under any GBFS tie-breaking strategy. For the remaining states, we show that some are expanded by all GBFS searches, while others are expanded only if certain conditions are met.

We propose techniques for efficiently determining optimal solutions to large logistics planning domain problems. We map a problem instance to a directed graph and show that no more than one vehicle per weakly connected component of the graph is needed for an optimal solution. We propose techniques for efficiently finding the vehicles which must be employed for an optimal solution. Also we develop a strong admissible heuristic based on the analysis of a directed graph, the cycles of which represent situations in the problem state in which a vehicle must visit a location more than once. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first method that determines optimal solutions for large logistics instances (including the largest instances in the IPC 1998 and IPC 2000 problem sets).

Potential heuristics for state-space search are defined as weighted sums over simple state features. Atomic features consider the value of a single state variable in a factored state representation, while binary features consider joint assignments to two state variables. Previous work showed that the set of all admissible and consistent potential heuristics using atomic features can be characterized by a compact set of linear constraints. We generalize this result to binary features and prove a hardness result for features of higher dimension. Furthermore, we prove a tractability result based on the treewidth of a new graphical structure we call the context-dependency graph. Finally, we study the relationship of potential heuristics to transition cost partitioning. Experimental results show that binary potential heuristics are significantly more informative than the previously considered atomic ones.

In classical planning, cost partitioning is a method for admissibly combining a set of heuristic estimators by distributing operator costs among the heuristics. An optimal cost partitioning is often prohibitively expensive to compute. Saturated cost partitioning is an alternative that is much faster to compute and has been shown to offer high-quality heuristic guidance on Cartesian abstractions. However, its greedy nature makes it highly susceptible to the order in which the heuristics are considered. We show that searching in the space of orders leads to significantly better heuristic estimates than with previously considered orders. Moreover, using multiple orders leads to a heuristic that is significantly better informed than any single-order heuristic. In experiments with Cartesian abstractions, the resulting heuristic approximates the optimal cost partitioning very closely.

One common pattern database compression technique is to merge adjacent database entries and store the minimum of merged entries to maintain heuristic admissibility. In this paper we propose a compression technique that preserves every entry, but reduces the number of bits used to store each entry, therefore limiting the values that can be represented. Even when this technique throws away low values in the heuristic, it can still have better performance than the traditional approach. We develop a theoretical basis for selecting which values to keep and show improved performance in both unidirectional and bidirectional search.

In domain-independent planning, dependencies of operators and variables often prevent the effective application of planning techniques that rely on "loosely coupled" problems (like factored planning or partial order reduction). In this paper, we propose a generic approach for factorizing a classical planning problem into an equivalent problem with fewer operator and variable dependencies. Our approach is based on variable factorization, which can be reduced to the well-studied problem of graph factorization. While the state spaces of the original and the factorized problems are isomorphic, the factorization offers the potential to exponentially reduce the complexity of planning techniques like factored planning and partial order reduction.

We analyze how complex a heuristic function must be to directly guide a state-space search algorithm towards the goal. As a case study, we examine functions that evaluate states with a weighted sum of state features. We measure the complexity of a domain by the complexity of the required features. We analyze conditions under which the search algorithm runs in polynomial time and show complexity results for several classical planning domains.

We propose an efficient method for determining optimal solutions to such skill-based solitaire card games as Freecell. We use A* search with an admissible heuristic function based on analyzing a directed graph whose cycles represent deadlock situations in the game state. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first algorithm that efficiently determines optimal solutions for Freecell games. We believe that the underlying ideas should be applicable not only to games but also to other classical planning problems which manifest deadlocks.

The merge-and-shrink framework provides a general basis for the computation of abstraction heuristics for factored transition systems. Recent experimental and theoretical research demonstrated the utility of non-linear merge strategies, which have not been studied in depth. We experimentally analyze the quality of state-of-the-art merge strategies by comparing them to random strategies and with respect to tie-breaking, showing that there is considerable room for improvement. We finally describe a new merge strategy that experimentally outperforms the current state of the art.

We propose and implement an efficient method for determining optimal solutions to such skill-based solitaire card games as Freecell and King Albert solitaire. We use A* search together with an admissible heuristic function that is based on analyzing a directed graph whose cycles represent deadlock situations in the game state. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first algorithm that efficiently determines optimal solutions for Freecell games. We believe that the underlying ideas should be applicable not only to games but also to other classical planning problems which manifest deadlocks.

We analyze how complex a heuristic function must be to directly guide a state-space search algorithm towards the goal. As a case study, we examine functions that evaluate states with a weighted sum of state features. We measure the complexity of a domain by the complexity of the required features. We analyze conditions under which the search algorithm runs in polynomial time and show complexity results for several classical planning domains.

We propose doppelkopf, a trick-taking card game with similarities to skat, as a benchmark problem for AI research. While skat has been extensively studied by the AI community in recent years, this is not true for doppelkopf. However, it has a substantially larger state space than skat and a unique key feature which distinguishes it from skat and other card games: players usually do not know with whom they play at the start of a game, figuring out the parties only in the process of playing.
Since its introduction in 2006, the UCT algorithm has been the dominating approach for solving games in AI research. It has notably achieved a playing strength comparable to good human players at playing go, but it has also shown good performance in card games like Klondike solitaire and skat. In this work, we adapt UCT to play doppelkopf and present an algorithm that generates random card assignments, used by the UCT algorithm for sampling. In our experiments, we discuss and evaluate different variants of the UCT algorithm, and we show that players based on UCT improve over simple baseline players and exhibit good card play behavior also when competing with a human player.

Symmetries provide the basis for well-established approaches to tackle the state explosion problem in state space search and in AI planning. However, although by now there are various symmetry-based techniques available, these techniques have not yet been empirically evaluated and compared to each other in a common setting. In particular, it is unclear which of them should be preferably applied, and whether there are techniques with stronger performance than others. In this paper, we shed light on this issue by providing an empirical case study. We combine and evaluate several symmetry-based techniques for cost-optimal planning as heuristic search. For our evaluation, we use state-of-the-art abstraction heuristics on a large set of benchmarks from the international planning competitions.

Many heuristics for cost-optimal planning are based on linear programming. We cover several interesting heuristics of this type by a common framework that fixes the objective function of the linear program. Within the framework, constraints from different heuristics can be combined in one heuristic estimate which dominates the maximum of the component heuristics. Different heuristics of the framework can be compared on the basis of their constraints. We present theoretical results on the relation between existing heuristics and experimental results that demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework.

Pruning techniques based on partial order reduction and symmetry elimination have recently found increasing attention for optimal planning. Although these techniques appear to be rather different, they base their pruning decisions on similar ideas from a high level perspective. In this paper, we propose safe integrations of partial order reduction and symmetry elimination for cost-optimal classical planning. We show that previously proposed symmetry-based search algorithms can safely be applied with strong stubborn sets. In addition, we derive the notion of symmetrical strong stubborn sets as a more tightly integrated concept. Our experiments show the potential of our approaches.

We describe transition normal form (TNF) for classical planning tasks, where there is a unique goal state and variables occur in an operator precondition iff they appear in the effect. Tasks can be efficiently converted to TNF, all common planning heuristics are invariant under the transformation, and tasks in normal form are easier to study theoretically.

We prove that general merge-and-shrink representations are strictly more powerful than linear ones by showing that there exist problem families that can be represented compactly with general merge-and-shrink representations but not with linear ones. We also give a precise bound that quantifies the necessary blowup incurred by conversions from general merge-and-shrink representations to linear representations or BDDs/ADDs. Our theoretical results suggest an untapped potential for non-linear merging strategies and for the use of non-linear merge-and-shrink-like representations within symbolic search.

Potential heuristics, recently introduced by Pommerening et al., characterize admissible and consistent heuristics for classical planning as a set of declarative constraints. Every feasible solution for these constraints defines an admissible heuristic, and we can obtain heuristics that optimize certain criteria such as informativeness by specifying suitable objective functions.

The original paper only considered one such objective function: maximizing the heuristic value of the initial state. In this paper, we explore objectives that attempt to maximize heuristic estimates for all states (reachable and unreachable), maximize heuristic estimates for a sample of reachable states, maximize the number of detected dead ends, or minimize search effort. We also search for multiple heuristics with complementary strengths that can be combined to obtain even better heuristics.

Sequential planning portfolios exploit the complementary strengths of different planners. Similarly, automated algorithm configuration tools can customize parameterized planning algorithms for a given type of tasks. Although some work has been done towards combining portfolios and algorithm configuration, the problem of automatically generating a sequential planning portfolio from a parameterized planner for a given type of tasks is still largely unsolved. Here, we present Cedalion, a conceptually simple approach for this problem that greedily searches for the pair of parameter configuration and runtime which, when appended to the current portfolio, maximizes portfolio improvement per additional runtime spent. We show theoretically that Cedalion yields portfolios provably within a constant factor of optimal for the training set distribution. We evaluate Cedalion empirically by applying it to construct sequential planning portfolios based on component planners from the highly parameterized Fast Downward (FD) framework. Results for a broad range of planning settings demonstrate that -- without any knowledge of planning or FD -- Cedalion constructs sequential FD portfolios that rival, and in some cases substantially outperform, manually-built FD portfolios.

Heuristic search is a state-of-the-art approach to classical planning. Several heuristic families were developed over the years to automatically estimate goal distance information from problem descriptions. Orthogonally to the development of better heuristics, recent years have seen an increasing interest in symmetry-based state space pruning techniques that aim at reducing the search effort. However, little work has dealt with how the heuristics behave under symmetries. We investigate the symmetry properties of existing heuristics and reveal that many of them are invariant under symmetries.

Merge-and-shrink heuristics crucially rely on effective reduction techniques, such as bisimulation-based shrinking, to avoid the combinatorial explosion of abstractions. We propose the concept of factored symmetries for merge-and-shrink abstractions based on the established concept of symmetry reduction for state-space search. We investigate under which conditions factored symmetry reduction yields perfect heuristics and discuss the relationship to bisimulation. We also devise practical merging strategies based on this concept and experimentally validate their utility.

Operator cost partitioning is a well-known technique to make admissible heuristics additive by distributing the operator costs among individual heuristics. Planning tasks are usually defined with non-negative operator costs and therefore it appears natural to demand the same for the distributed costs. We argue that this requirement is not necessary and demonstrate the benefit of using general cost partitioning. We show that LP heuristics for operator-counting constraints are cost-partitioned heuristics and that the state equation heuristic computes a cost partitioning over atomic projections. We also introduce a new family of potential heuristics and show their relationship to general cost partitioning.

Bounded intention planning provides a pruning technique for optimal planning that has been proposed several years ago. In addition, partial order reduction techniques based on stubborn sets have recently been investigated for this purpose. In this paper, we revisit bounded intention planning in the view of stubborn sets.

The LM-Cut heuristic is currently the most successful heuristic in optimal STRIPS planning but it cannot be applied in the presence of conditional effects. Keyder, Hoffmann and Haslum recently showed that the obvious extensions to such effects ruin the nice theoretical properties of LM-Cut. We propose a new method based on context splitting that preserves these properties.

Pattern Databases (PDBs) are a common form of abstraction-based heuristic which are often compressed so that a large PDB can fit in memory. Partial Pattern Databases (PPDBs) achieve this by storing only layers of the PDB which are close to the goal. This paper studies the problem of how to best compress and use the 457 GB 12-edge Rubik's cube PDB, suggesting a number of ways that Bloom filters can be used to effectively compress PPDBs. We then develop a theoretical model of the common min compression approach and our Bloom filters, showing that the original method of compressed PPDBs can never be better than min compression. We conclude with experimental results showing that Bloom filter compression of PPDBs provides superior performance to min compression in Rubik's cube.

Label reduction is a technique for simplifying families of labeled transition systems by dropping distinctions between certain transition labels. While label reduction is critical to the efficient computation of merge-and-shrink heuristics, current theory only permits reducing labels in a limited number of cases. We generalize this theory so that labels can be reduced in every intermediate abstraction of a merge-and-shrink tree. This is particularly important for efficiently computing merge-and-shrink abstractions based on non-linear merge strategies. As a case study, we implement a non-linear merge strategy based on the original work on merge-and-shrink heuristics in model checking by Dräger et al.

Many heuristics for cost-optimal planning are based on linear programming. We cover several interesting heuristics of this type by a common framework that fixes the objective function of the linear program. Within the framework, constraints from different heuristics can be combined in one heuristic estimate which dominates the maximum of the component heuristics. Different heuristics of the framework can be compared on the basis of their constraints. With this new method of analysis, we show dominance of the recent LP-based state-equation heuristic over optimal cost partitioning on single-variable abstractions. We also show that the previously suggested extension of the state-equation heuristic to exploit safe variables cannot lead to an improved heuristic estimate. We experimentally evaluate the potential of the proposed framework on an extensive suite of benchmark tasks.

We have recently shown how counterexample-guided abstraction refinement can be used to derive informative Cartesian abstraction heuristics for optimal classical planning. In this work we introduce two methods for producing diverse sets of heuristics within this framework, one based on goal facts, the other based on landmarks. In order to sum the heuristic estimates admissibly we present a novel way of finding cost partitionings for explicitly represented abstraction heuristics. We show that the resulting heuristics outperform other state-of-the-art abstraction heuristics on many benchmark domains.

Strong stubborn sets have recently been analyzed and successfully applied as a pruning technique for planning as heuristic search. Strong stubborn sets are defined declaratively as constraints over operator sets. We show how these constraints can be relaxed to offer more freedom in choosing stubborn sets while maintaining the correctness and optimality of the approach. In general, many operator sets satisfy the definition of stubborn sets. We study different strategies for selecting among these possibilities and show that existing approaches can be considerably improved by rather simple strategies, eliminating most of the overhead of the previous state of the art.

A general and important problem of search-based planning techniques is the state explosion problem, which is usually tackled with approaches to reduce the branching factor of the planning task. Such approaches often implicitly exploit the observation that the number of available operators is higher than the number of operators that are actually needed to find a plan. In this paper, we propose a simple, but general under-approximation refinement framework for satisficing planning that explicitly exploits this observation. Our approach iteratively searches for plans with operator subsets, which are refined if necessary by adding operators that appear to be needed. Our evaluation shows that even a straight-forward instantiation of this framework yields a competitive planner that often finds plans with small operator sets.

The LM-Cut heuristic is currently the most successful heuristic in optimal STRIPS planning but it cannot be applied in the presence of conditional effects. Keyder, Hoffmann and Haslum recently showed that the obvious extensions to such effects ruin the nice theoretical properties of LM-Cut. We propose a new method based on context splitting that preserves these properties.

Label reduction is a technique for simplifying families of labeled transition systems by dropping distinctions between certain transition labels. While label reduction is critical to the efficient computation of merge-and-shrink heuristics, current theory only permits reducing labels in a limited number of cases. We generalize this theory so that labels can be reduced in every intermediate abstraction of a merge-and-shrink tree. This is particularly important for efficiently computing merge-and-shrink abstractions based on non-linear merge strategies. As a case study, we implement a non-linear merge strategy based on the original work on merge-and-shrink heuristics in model checking by Dräger et al.

Many areas of computer science require answering questions about reachability in compactly described discrete transition systems. Answering such questions effectively requires techniques able to do so without building the entire system. In particular, heuristic search uses lower-bounding ("admissible") heuristic functions to prune parts of the system known to not contain an optimal solution. A prominent technique for deriving such bounds is to consider abstract transition systems that aggregate groups of states into one. The key question is how to design and represent such abstractions. The most successful answer to this question are pattern databases, which aggregate states if and only if they agree on a subset of the state variables. Merge-and-shrink abstraction is a new paradigm that, as we show, allows to compactly represent a more general class of abstractions, stricly dominating pattern databases in theory. We identify the maximal class of transition systems, which we call factored transition systems, to which merge-and-shrink applies naturally, and we show that the well-known notion of bisimilarity can be adapted to this framework in a way that still guarantees perfect heuristic functions, while potentially reducing abstraction size exponentially. Applying these ideas to planning, one of the foundational subareas of artificial intelligence, we show that in some benchmarks this size reduction leads to the computation of perfect heuristic functions in polynomial time and that more approximate merge-and-shrink strategies yield heuristic functions competitive with the state of the art.

Dynamic programming is a well-known approach for solving MDPs. In large state spaces, asynchronous versions like Real-Time Dynamic Programming (RTDP) have been applied successfully. If unfolded into equivalent trees, Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithms are a valid alternative. UCT, the most popular representative, obtains good anytime behavior by guiding the search towards promising areas of the search tree and supporting non-admissible heuristics. The global Heuristic Search algorithm AO* finds optimal solutions for MDPs that can be represented as acyclic AND/OR graphs.

Despite the differences, these approaches actually have much in common. We present the Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search (THTS) framework that subsumes these approaches and distinguishes them based on five ingredients: heuristic function, backup function, action selection, outcome selection, and trial length. We describe the ingredients that model RTDP, AO* and UCT within this framework, and use THTS to combine attributes of these algorithms step by step in order to derive novel algorithms with superior theoretical properties. We merge Full Bellman and Monte-Carlo backup functions to Partial Bellman backups, and gain a function that both allows partial updates and a procedure that labels states when they are solved. DP-UCT combines attributes and theoretical properties from RTDP and UCT even though it differs from the latter only in the used Partial Bellman backups. Our main algorithm, UCT* adds a limited trial length to DP-UCT to inherit the global search behavior of AO*, which ensures that parts of the state space that are closer to the root are investigated more thoroughly. The experimental evaluation shows that both DP-UCT and UCT* are not only superior to UCT, but also outperform PROST, the winner of the International Probabilistic Planning Competition (IPPC) 2011 on the benchmarks of IPPC 2011.

Research in automated planning is getting more and more focused on empirical evaluation. Likewise the need for methodologies and benchmarks to build solid evaluations of planners is increasing. In 1998 the planning community made a move to address this need and initiated the International Planning Competition - or IPC for short. This competition has typically been conducted every two years in the context of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS) and tries to define standard metrics and benchmarks to reliably evaluate planners. In the sixth edition of the competition, IPC 2008, there was an attempt to automate the evaluation of all entries in the competition which was imitated to a large extent and extended in several ways in the seventh edition, IPC 2011. As a result, a software for automatically running planning experiments and inspecting the results is available, encouraging researchers to use it for their own research interests. The software allows researchers to reproduce and inspect the results of IPC 2011, but also to generate and analyze new experiments with private sets of planners and problems. In this paper we provide a gentle introduction to this software and examine the main difficulties, both from a scientific and engineering point of view, in assessing the performance of automated planners.

The iPDB procedure by Haslum et al. is the state-of-the-art method for computing additive abstraction heuristics for domain-independent planning. It performs a hill-climbing search in the space of pattern collections, combining information from multiple patterns in the so-called canonical heuristic.

We show how stronger heuristic estimates can be obtained through linear programming. An experimental evaluation demonstrates the strength of the new technique on the IPC benchmark suite.

We recently showed how counterexample-guided abstraction refinement can be used to derive informative heuristics for optimal classical planning. In this work we introduce an algorithm for building additive abstractions and demonstrate that they outperform other state-of-the-art abstraction heuristics on many benchmark domains.

Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) is a methodological framework for incrementally computing abstractions of transition systems.

We propose a CEGAR algorithm for computing abstraction heuristics for optimal classical planning. Starting from a coarse abstraction of the planning task, we iteratively compute an optimal abstract solution, check if and why it fails for the concrete planning task and refine the abstraction so that the same failure cannot occur in future iterations.

A key ingredient of our approach is a novel class of abstractions for classical planning tasks that admits efficient and very fine-grained refinement. Our implementation performs tens of thousands of refinement steps in a few minutes and produces heuristics that are often significantly more accurate than pattern database heuristics of the same size.

In the last years, pruning techniques based on partial order reduction have found increasing attention in the planning community. One recent result is that the expansion core method is a special case of the strong stubborn sets method proposed in model checking. However, it is still an open question if there exist efficiently computable strong stubborn sets with strictly higher pruning power than expansion core. In this paper, we prove that the pruning power of strong stubborn sets is strictly higher than the pruning power of expansion core even for a straight-forward instantiation of strong stubborn sets. This instantiation is as efficiently computable as expansion core. Hence, our theoretical results suggest that strong stubborn sets should be preferred to expansion core. Our empirical evaluation on all optimal benchmarks from the international planning competitions up to 2011 supports the theoretical results.

In large and complex planning problems, there will almost inevitably be aspects that are not relevant to a specific problem instance. Thus, identifying and removing irrelevant parts from an instance is one of the most important techniques for scaling up automated planning. We examine the path-based relevance analysis method, which is safe (preserves plan existence and cost) and powerful but has exponential time complexity, and show how to make it run in polynomial time with only a minimal loss of pruning power.

Perimeter search is a bidirectional search algorithm consisting of two phases. In the first phase, a limited regression search computes the perimeter, a region which must necessarily be passed in every solution. In the second phase, a heuristic forward search finds an optimal plan from the initial state to the perimeter.

The drawback of perimeter search is the need to compute heuristic estimates towards every state on the perimeter in the forward phase. We show that this limitation can be effectively overcome when using pattern database (PDB) heuristics in the forward phase.

The combination of perimeter search and PDB heuristics has been considered previously by Felner and Ofek for solving combinatorial puzzles. They claimed that, based on theoretical considerations and experimental evidence, the use of perimeter search in this context offers "limited or no benefits". Our theoretical and experimental results show that this assessment should be revisited.

Dynamic programming is a well-known approach for solving MDPs. In large state spaces, asynchronous versions like Real-Time Dynamic Programming have been applied successfully. If unfolded into equivalent trees, Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithms are a valid alternative. UCT, the most popular representative, obtains good anytime behavior by guiding the search towards promising areas of the search tree. The Heuristic Search algorithm AO* finds optimal solutions for MDPs that can be represented as acyclic AND/OR graphs.

We introduce a common framework, Trial-based Heuristic Tree Search, that subsumes these approaches and distinguishes them based on five ingredients: heuristic function, backup function, action selection, outcome selection, and trial length. Using this framework, we describe three new algorithms which mix these ingredients in novel ways in an attempt to combine their different strengths. Our evaluation shows that two of our algorithms not only provide superior theoretical properties to UCT, but also outperform state-of-the-art approaches experimentally.

In heuristic search and especially in optimal classical planning the computation of accurate heuristic values can take up the majority of runtime. In many cases, the heuristic computations for a search node and its successors are very similar, leading to significant duplication of effort. For example most landmarks of a node that are computed by the LM-cut algorithm are also landmarks for the node's successors.

We propose to reuse these landmarks and incrementally compute new ones to speed up the LM-cut calculation. The speed advantage obtained by incremental computation is offset by higher memory usage. We investigate different search algorithms that reduce memory usage without sacrificing the faster computation, leading to a substantial increase in coverage for benchmark domains from the International Planning Competitions.

We adapt a partial order reduction technique based on stubborn sets, originally proposed for detecting dead ends in Petri Nets, to the setting of optimal planning. We demonstrate that stubborn sets can provide significant state space reductions on standard planning benchmarks, outperforming the expansion core method.

Optimal solutions for multi-agent pathfinding problems are often too expensive to compute. For this reason, suboptimal approaches have been widely studied in the literature. Specifically, in recent years a number of efficient suboptimal algorithms that are complete for certain subclasses have been proposed at highly-rated robotics and AI conferences, all mentioning that it is an open problem which subclasses of non-optimal multi-agent pathfinding are tractable. However, it turns out that this problem has already been completely solved in another research community in the 1980s by a constructive proof that provides a polynomial algorithm that is complete for the entire class of problems. In this paper, we would like to bring this earlier related work to the attention of the robotics and AI communities.

This paper presents a new anytime search algorithm, anytime explicit estimation search (AEES). AEES is an anytime search algorithm which attempts to minimize the time between improvements to its incumbent solution by taking advantage of the differences between solution cost and length. We provide an argument that minimizing the time between solutions is the right thing to do for an anytime search algorithm and show that when actions have differing costs, many state-of-the-art search algorithms, including the search strategy of LAMA11 and anytime nonparametric A*, do not minimize the time between solutions. An empirical evaluation on seven domains shows that AEES often has both the shortest time between incumbent solutions and the best solution in hand for a wide variety of cutoffs.

Despite their general success in the heuristic search community, pattern database (PDB) heuristics have, until very recently, not been used by the most successful classical planning systems.

We describe a new efficient implementation of pattern database heuristics within the Fast Downward planner. A planning system using this implementation is competitive with the state of the art in optimal planning, significantly improving over results from the previous best PDB heuristic implementation in planning.

Optimal plans of delete-free planning tasks are interesting both in domains that have no delete effects and as the relaxation heuristic h+ in general planning. Many heuristics for optimal and satisficing planning approximate the h+ heuristic, which is well-informed and admissible but intractable to compute. In this work, branch-and-bound and IDA* search are used in a search space tailored to delete-free planning together with an incrementally computed version of the LM-cut heuristic. The resulting algorithm for optimal delete-free planning exceeds the performance of A* with the LM-cut heuristic in the state-of-the-art planner Fast Downward.

Portfolio planners and parameter tuning are two ideas that have recently attracted significant attention in the domain-independent planning community. We combine these two ideas and present a portfolio planner that runs automatically configured planners. We let the automatic parameter tuning framework ParamILS find fast configurations of the Fast Downward planning system for a number of planning domains. Afterwards we learn a portfolio of those planner configurations. Evaluation of our portfolio planner on the IPC 2011 domains shows that it has a significantly higher IPC score than the winner of the sequential satisficing track.

Partial order reduction is a state space pruning approach that has been originally introduced in computer aided verification. Recently, various partial order reduction techniques have also been proposed for planning. Despite very similar underlying ideas, the relevant literature from computer aided verification has hardly been analyzed in the planning area so far, and it is unclear how these techniques are formally related. We provide an analysis of existing partial order reduction techniques and their relationships. We show that recently proposed approaches in planning are instances of general partial order reduction approaches from computer aided verification. Our analysis reveals a hierarchy of dominance relationships and shows that there is still room for improvement for partial order reduction techniques in planning. Overall, we provide a first step towards a better understanding and a unifying theory of partial order reduction techniques from different areas.

Merge-and-shrink abstraction (M&S) is an approach for constructing admissible heuristic functions for cost-optimal planning. It enables the targeted design of abstractions, by allowing to choose individual pairs of (abstract) states to aggregate into one. A key question is how to actually make these choices, so as to obtain an informed heuristic at reasonable computational cost. Recent work has addressed this via the well-known notion of bisimulation. When aggregating only bisimilar states – essentially, states whose behavior is identical under every planning operator – M&S yields a perfect heuristic. However, bisimulations are typically exponentially large. Thus we must relax the bisimulation criterion, so that it applies to more state pairs, and yields smaller abstractions. We herein devise a fine-grained method for doing so. We restrict the bisimulation criterion to consider only a subset K of the planning operators. We show that, if K is chosen appropriately, then M&S still yields a perfect heuristic, while abstraction size may decrease exponentially. Designing practical approximations for K, we obtain M&S heuristics that are competitive with the state of the art.

A* with admissible heuristics is a very successful approach to optimal planning. But how to derive such heuristics automatically? Merge-and-shrink abstraction (M&S) is a general approach to heuristic design whose key advantage is its capability to make very fine-grained choices in defining abstractions. However, little is known about how to actually make these choices. We address this via the well-known notion of bisimulation. When aggregating only bisimilar states, M&s yields a perfect heuristic. Alas, bisimulations are exponentially large even in trivial domains. We show how to apply label reduction -- not distinguishing between certain groups of operators -- without incurring any information loss, while potentially reducing bisimulation size exponentially. In several benchmark domains, the resulting algorithm computes perfect heuristics in polynomial time. Empirically, we show that approximating variants of this algorithm improve the state of the art in M&S heuristics. In particular, a hybrid of two such variants is competitive with the leading heuristic LM-cut.

BJOLP, The Big Joint Optimal Landmarks Planner uses landmarks to derive an admissible heuristic, which is then used to guide a search for a cost-optimal plan. In this paper we review landmarks and describe how they can be used to derive an admissible heuristic. We conclude with presenting the BJOLP planner.

LAMA is a propositional planning system based on heuristic search with landmarks. This paper describes two versions of LAMA that were entered into the 2011 International Planning Competition: the original LAMA as developed for the 2008 competition and a new re-implementation of LAMA that uses the latest version of the Fast Downward Planning Framework.

Landmarks are propositions that must be true in every solution of a planning task. LAMA uses a heuristic derived from landmarks in conjunction with the well-known FF heuristic. LAMA builds on the Fast Downward Planning System using non-binary (but finite domain) state variables and multi-heuristic search. A weighted A* search is used with iteratively decreasing weights, so that the planner continues to search for plans of better quality until the search is terminated. LAMA combines cost-to-goal and distance-to-goal estimates with the aim of finding good solutions using reasonable runtime.

The LM-Cut planner uses the landmark-cut heuristic, introduced by the authors in 2009, within a standard A* progression search framework to find optimal sequential plans for STRIPS-style planning tasks. This short paper recapitulates the main ideas surrounding the landmark-cut heuristic and provides pointers for further reading.

Merge-and-shrink abstraction is a general approach to heuristic design whose key advantage is its capability to make very fine-grained choices in defining abstractions. The Merge-and-shrink planner uses two different strategies for making these choices, both based on the well-known notion of bisimulation. The resulting heuristics are used in two sequential runs of A* search.

The SelMax planner combines two state-of-the-art admissible heuristics using an online learning approach. In this paper we describe the online learning approach employed by SelMax, briefly review the Fast Downward framework, and describe the SelMax planner.

Fast Downward Stone Soup is a sequential portfolio planner that uses various heuristics and search algorithms that have been implemented in the Fast Downward planning system.

We present a simple general method for concocting "planner soups", sequential portfolios of planning algorithms, and describe the actual recipes used for Fast Downward Stone Soup in the sequential optimization and sequential satisficing tracks of IPC 2011.

The FD-Autotune submissions for the IPC-2011 sequential tracks consist of three instantiations of the latest, highly parametric version of the Fast Downward Planning Framework. These instantiations have been automatically configured for performance on a wide range of planning domains, using the well-known ParamILS configurator. Two of the instantiations were entered into the sequential satisficing track and one into the sequential optimising track. We describe how the extremely large configuration space of Fast Downward was restricted to a subspace that, although still very large, can be managed by state-of-the-art automated configuration procedures, and how ParamILS was then used to obtain performance-optimised configurations.

The FD-Autotune learning planning system is based on the idea of domain-specific configuration of the latest, highly parametric version of the Fast Downward Planning Framework by means of a generic automated algorithm configuration procedure. We describe how the extremely large configuration space of Fast Downward was restricted to a subspace that, although still very large, can be managed by state-of-the-art automated configuration procedures. FD-Autotune uses the well-known ParamILS configurator and was realised using the recently developed HAL experimentation environment.

Fast Downward Stone Soup is a sequential portfolio planner that uses various heuristics and search algorithms that have been implemented in the Fast Downward planning system.

We present a simple general method for concocting "planner soups", sequential portfolios of planning algorithms, and describe the actual recipes used for Fast Downward Stone Soup in the sequential optimization and sequential satisficing tracks of IPC 2011.

This paper is, first and foremost, a planner description. Fast Downward Stone Soup was entered into the sequential (non-learning) tracks of IPC 2011. Due to time constraints, we did not enter it into the learning competition at IPC 2011. However, we believe that the approach might still be of interest to the planning and learning community, as it represents a baseline against which other, more sophisticated portfolio learners can be usefully compared.

In this work, we present the FD-Autotune learning planning system, which is based on the idea of domain-specific configuration of the latest, highly parametric version of the Fast Downward Planning Framework by means of a generic automated algorithm configuration procedure. We describe how the extremely large configuration space of Fast Downward was restricted to a subspace that, although still very large, can be managed by a state-of-the-art automated configuration procedure. Additionally, we give preliminary results obtained from applying our approach to the nine domains of the IPC-2011 learning track, using the well-known ParamILS configurator and the recently developed HAL experimentation environment.

A* with admissible heuristics is a very successful approach to optimal planning. But how to derive such heuristics automatically? Merge-and-shrink abstraction (M&S) is a general approach to heuristic design whose key advantage is its capability to make very fine-grained choices in defining abstractions. However, little is known about how to actually make these choices. We address this via the well-known notion of bisimulation. When aggregating only bisimilar states, M&s yields a perfect heuristic. Alas, bisimulations are exponentially large even in trivial domains. We show how to apply label reduction -- not distinguishing between certain groups of operators -- without incurring any information loss, while potentially reducing bisimulation size exponentially. In several benchmark domains, the resulting algorithm computes perfect heuristics in polynomial time. Empirically, we show that approximating variants of this algorithm improve the state of the art in M&S heuristics. In particular, a hybrid of two such variants is competitive with the leading heuristic LM-cut.

Fluent merging is a reformulation technique for classical planning problems that can be applied automatically or semi-automatically. The reformulation strives to transform a planning task into a representation that allows a planning algorithm to find solutions more efficiently or to find solutions of better quality. This work introduces different approaches for fluent merging and evaluates them within a state-of-the-art planning system.

The pancake problem is a famous search problem where the objective is to sort a sequence of objects (pancakes) through a minimal number of prefix reversals (flips). The best approaches for the problem are based on heuristic search with abstraction (pattern database) heuristics. We present a new class of abstractions for the pancake problem called relative-order abstractions. Relative-order abstractions have three advantages over the object-location abstractions considered in previous work. First, they are size-independent, i.e., do not need to be tailored to a particular instance size of the pancake problem. Second, they are more compact in that they can represent a larger number of pancakes within abstractions of bounded size. Finally, they can exploit symmetries in the problem specification to allow multiple heuristic lookups, significantly improving search performance over a single lookup. Our experiments show that compared to object-location abstractions, our new techniques lead to an improvement of one order of magnitude in runtime and up to three orders of magnitude in the number of generated states.

The landmark cut heuristic is perhaps the strongest known polytime admissible approximation of the optimal delete relaxation heuristic h⁺. Equipped with this heuristic, a best-first search was able to optimally solve 40% more benchmark problems than the winners of the sequential optimization track of IPC 2008. We show that this heuristic can be understood as a simple relaxation of a hitting set problem, and that stronger heuristics can be obtained by considering stronger relaxations. Based on these findings, we propose a simple polytime method for obtaining heuristics stronger than landmark cut, and evaluate them over benchmark problems. We also show that hitting sets can be used to characterize h⁺ and thus provide a fresh and novel insight for better comprehension of the delete relaxation.

Landmarks for a planning problem are subgoals that are necessarily made true at some point in the execution of any plan. Since verifying that a fact is a landmark is PSPACE-complete, earlier approaches have focused on finding landmarks for the delete relaxation Π⁺. Furthermore, some of these approaches have approximated this set of landmarks, although it has been shown that the complete set of causal delete-relaxation landmarks can be identified in polynomial time by a simple procedure over the relaxed planning graph. Here, we give a declarative characterisation of this set of landmarks and show that the procedure computes the landmarks described by our characterisation. Building on this, we observe that the procedure can be applied to any delete-relaxation problem and take advantage of a recent compilation of the m-relaxation of a problem into a problem with no delete effects to extract landmarks that take into account delete effects in the original problem. We demonstrate that this approach finds strictly more causal landmarks than previous approaches and discuss the relationship between increased computational effort and experimental performance, using these landmarks in a recently proposed admissible landmark-counting heuristic.

We consider the stochastic variant of the Canadian Traveler's Problem, a path planning problem where adverse weather can cause some roads to be untraversable. The agent does not initially know which roads can be used. However, it knows a probability distribution for the weather, and it can observe the status of roads incident to its location. The objective is to find a policy with low expected travel cost.

We introduce and compare several algorithms for the stochastic CTP. Unlike the optimistic approach most commonly considered in the literature, the new approaches we propose take uncertainty into account explicitly. We show that this property enables them to generate policies of much higher quality than the optimistic one, both theoretically and experimentally.

We describe the gap heuristic for the pancake problem, which dramatically outperforms current abstraction-based heuristics for this problem. The gap heuristic belongs to a family of landmark heuristics that have recently been very successfully applied to planning problems.

We introduce the Scanalyzer planning domain, a domain for classical planning which models the problem of automatic greenhouse logistic management.

At its mathematical core, the Scanalyzer domain is a permutation problem with striking similarities to common search benchmarks such as Rubik's Cube or TopSpin. At the same time, it is also a real application domain, and efficient algorithms for the problem are of considerable practical interest.

The Scanalyzer domain was used as a benchmark for sequential planners at the last International Planning Competition. The competition results show that domain-independent automated planners can find solutions of comparable quality to those generated by specialized algorithms developed by domain experts, while being considerably more flexible.

When planning in an uncertain environment, one is often interested in finding a contingent plan that prescribes appropriate actions for all possible states that may be encountered during the execution of the plan. We consider the problem of finding strong and strong cyclic plans for fully observable nondeterministic (FOND) planning problems. The algorithm we choose is LAO*, an informed explicit state search algorithm. We investigate the use of pattern database (PDB) heuristics to guide LAO* towards goal states. To obtain a fully domain-independent planning system, we use an automatic pattern selection procedure that performs local search in the space of pattern collections. The evaluation of our system on the FOND benchmarks of the Uncertainty Part of the International Planning Competition 2008 shows that our approach is competitive with symbolic regression search in terms of problem coverage and speed.

We empirically examine several ways of exploiting the information of multiple heuristics in a satisficing best-first search algorithm, comparing their performance in terms of coverage, plan quality, speed, and search guidance. Our results indicate that using multiple heuristics for satisficing search is indeed useful. Among the combination methods we consider, the best results are obtained by the alternation method of the "Fast Diagonally Downward" planner.

We consider the stochastic variant of the Canadian Traveler's Problem, a path planning problem where adverse weather can cause some roads to be untraversable. The agent does not initially know which roads can be used. However, it knows a probability distribution for the weather, and it can observe the status of roads incident to its location. The objective is to find a policy with low expected travel cost.

We introduce and compare several algorithms for the stochastic CTP. Unlike the optimistic approach most commonly considered in the literature, the new approaches we propose take uncertainty into account explicitly. We show that this property enables them to generate policies of much higher quality than the optimistic one, both theoretically and experimentally.

Recently, Helmert and Geffner proposed the context-enhanced additive heuristic, where fact costs are evaluated relative to context states that arise from achieving first a pivot condition of each operator. As Helmert and Geffner pointed out, the method can be generalized to consider contexts arising from arbitrary precedence constraints over operator conditions instead. Herein, we provide such a generalization. We extend Helmert and Geffner's equations, and discuss a number of design choices that arise. Drawing on previous work on goal orderings, we design a family of methods for automatically generating precedence constraints. We run large-scale experiments, showing that the technique can help significantly, depending on the choice of precedence constraints. We shed some light on this by profiling the behavior of all possible precedence constraints, using a sampling technique.

Current heuristic estimators for classical domain-independent planning are usually based on one of four ideas: delete relaxations, critical paths, abstractions, and, most recently, landmarks. Previously, these different ideas for deriving heuristic functions were largely unconnected.

We prove that admissible heuristics based on these ideas are in fact very closely related. Exploiting this relationship, we introduce a new admissible heuristic called the landmark cut heuristic, which compares favourably with the state of the art in terms of heuristic accuracy and overall performance.

Heuristic forward search is the dominant approach to satisficing planning to date. Most successful planning systems, however, go beyond plain heuristic search by employing various search-enhancement techniques. One example is the use of helpful actions or preferred operators, providing information which may complement heuristic values. A second example is deferred heuristic evaluation, a search variant which can reduce the number of costly node evaluations. Despite the wide-spread use of these search-enhancement techniques however, we note that few results have been published examining their usefulness. In particular, while various ways of using, and possibly combining, these techniques are conceivable, no work to date has studied the performance of such variations. In this paper, we address this gap by examining the use of preferred operators and deferred evaluation in a variety of settings within best-first search. In particular, our findings are consistent with and help explain the good performance of the winners of the satisficing tracks at IPC 2004 and 2008.

Many heuristic estimators for classical planning are based on the so-called delete relaxation, which ignores negative effects of planning operators. Ideally, such heuristics would compute the actual goal distance in the delete relaxation, i.e., the cost of an optimal relaxed plan, denoted by h+. However, current delete relaxation heuristics only provide (often inadmissible) estimates to h+ because computing the correct value is an NP-hard problem.

In this work, we consider the approach of planning with the actual h+ heuristic from a theoretical and computational perspective. In particular, we provide domain-dependent complexity results that classify some standard benchmark domains into ones where h+ can be computed efficiently and ones where computing h+ is NP-hard. Moreover, we study domain-dependent implementations of h+ which show that the h+ heuristic provides very informative heuristic estimates compared to other state-of-the-art heuristics.

The problem of effectively combining multiple heuristic estimators has been studied extensively in the context of optimal planning, but not in the context of satisficing planning. To narrow this gap, we empirically examine several ways of exploiting the information of multiple heuristics in a satisficing best-first search algorithm, comparing their performance in terms of coverage, plan quality and runtime. Our empirical results indicate that using multiple heuristics for satisficing search is indeed useful and that the best results are not obtained by the most obvious combination methods.

Many heuristic estimators for classical planning are based on the so-called delete relaxation, which ignores negative effects of planning operators. Ideally, such heuristics would compute the actual goal distance in the delete relaxation, i.e., the cost of an optimal relaxed plan, denoted by h+. However, current delete relaxation heuristics only provide (often inadmissible) estimates to h+ because computing the correct value is an NP-hard problem.

In this work, we consider the approach of planning with the actual h+ heuristic from a theoretical and computational perspective. In particular, we provide domain-dependent complexity results that classify some standard benchmark domains into ones where h+ can be computed efficiently and ones where computing h+ is NP-hard. Moreover, we study domain-dependent implementations of h+ which show that the h+ heuristic provides very informative heuristic estimates compared to other state-of-the-art heuristics.

Directed model checking is a well-established technique to tackle the state explosion problem when the aim is to find error states in large systems. In this approach, the state space traversal is guided through a function that estimates the distance to nearest error states. States with lower estimates are preferably expanded during the search. Obviously, the challenge is to develop distance functions that are efficiently computable on the one hand and as informative as possible on the other hand. In this paper, we introduce the causal graph structure to the context of directed model checking. Based on causal graph analysis, we first adapt a distance estimation function from AI planning to directed model checking. Furthermore, we investigate an abstraction that is guaranteed to preserve error states. The experimental evaluation shows the practical potential of these techniques.

Thanks to recent advances, AI Planning has become the underlying technique for several applications. Figuring prominently among these is automated Web Service Composition (WSC) at the "capability" level, where services are described in terms of preconditions and effects over ontological concepts. A key issue in addressing WSC as planning is that ontologies are not only formal vocabularies; they also axiomatize the possible relationships between concepts. Such axioms correspond to what has been termed "integrity constraints" in the actions and change literature, and applying a web service is essentially a belief update operation. The reasoning required for belief update is known to be harder than reasoning in the ontology itself. The support for belief update is severely limited in current planning tools.

Our first contribution consists in identifying an interesting special case of WSC which is both significant and more tractable. The special case, which we term forward effects, is characterized by the fact that every ramification of a web service application involves at least one new constant generated as output by the web service. We show that, in this setting, the reasoning required for belief update simplifies to standard reasoning in the ontology itself. This relates to, and extends, current notions of "message-based" WSC, where the need for belief update is removed by a strong (often implicit or informal) assumption of "locality" of the individual messages. We clarify the computational properties of the forward effects case, and point out a strong relation to standard notions of planning under uncertainty, suggesting that effective tools for the latter can be successfully adapted to address the former.

Furthermore, we identify a significant sub-case, named strictly forward effects, where an actual compilation into planning under uncertainty exists. This enables us to exploit off-the-shelf planning tools to solve message-based WSC in a general form that involves powerful ontologies, and requires reasoning about partial matches between concepts. We provide empirical evidence that this approach may be quite effective, using Conformant-FF as the underlying planner.

We introduce an efficient method for translating planning tasks specified in the standard PDDL formalism into a concise grounded representation that uses finite-domain state variables instead of the straight-forward propositional encoding.

Translation is performed in four stages. Firstly, we transform the input task into an equivalent normal form expressed in a restricted fragment of PDDL. Secondly, we synthesize invariants of the planning task that identify groups of mutually exclusive propositions which can be represented by a single finite-domain variable. Thirdly, we perform an efficient relaxed reachability analysis using logic programming techniques to obtain a grounded representation of the input. Finally, we combine the results of the third and fourth stage to generate the final grounded finite-domain representation.

The presented approach has originally been implemented as part of the Fast Downward planning system for the 4th International Planning Competition (IPC4). Since then, it has been used in a number of other contexts with considerable success, and the use of concise finite-domain representations has become a common feature of state-of-the-art planners.

Integrating agent programming languages and efficient action planning is a promising approach because it combines the expressive power of languages such as Golog with the possibility of searching for plans efficiently. In order to integrate a Golog interpreter with a planner, one has to understand, however, which part of the expressiveness of Golog can be captured by the planning language. Using Nebel's compilation framework, we identify a maximal fragment of basic action theories, the formalism Golog is based on, that is expressively equivalent to the ADL subset of PDDL. As we will show, almost all features that permit to specify incomplete information in basic action theories cannot be compiled to ADL.

Many current heuristics for domain-independent planning, such as Bonet and Geffner's additive heuristic and Hoffmann and Nebel's FF heuristic, are based on delete relaxations. They estimate the goal distance of a search state by approximating the solution cost in a relaxed task where negative consequences of operator applications are ignored. Helmert's causal graph heuristic, on the other hand, approximates goal distances by solving a hierarchy of "local" planning problems that only involve a single state variable and the variables it depends on directly.

Superficially, the causal graph heuristic appears quite unrelated to heuristics based on delete relaxation. In this contribution, we show that the opposite is true. Using a novel, declarative formulation of the causal graph heuristic, we show that the causal graph heuristic is the additive heuristic plus context. Unlike the original heuristic, our formulation does not require the causal graph to be acyclic, and thus leads to a proper generalization of both the causal graph and additive heuristics. Empirical results show that the new heuristic is significantly better informed than both Helmert's original causal graph heuristic and the additive heuristic and outperforms them across a wide range of standard benchmarks.

Many AI problems can be recast as finding an optimal path in a discrete state space. An abstraction defines an admissible heuristic function as the distances in a smaller state space where arbitrary sets of states are "aggregated" into single states. A special case are pattern database (PDB) heuristics, which aggregate states iff they agree on the state variables inside the pattern. Explicit-state abstraction is more flexible, explicitly aggregating selected pairs of states in a process that interleaves composition of abstractions with abstraction of the composites. The increased flexibility gains expressive power: sometimes, the real cost function can be represented concisely as an explicit-state abstraction, but not as a PDB. Explicit-state abstraction has been applied to planning and model checking, with highly promising empirical results.

Heuristic search using algorithms such as A* and IDA* is the prevalent method for obtaining optimal sequential solutions for classical planning tasks. Theoretical analyses of these classical search algorithms, such as the well-known results of Pohl, Gaschnig and Pearl, suggest that such heuristic search algorithms can obtain better than exponential scaling behaviour, provided that the heuristics are accurate enough.

Here, we show that for a number of common planning benchmark domains, including ones that admit optimal solution in polynomial time, general search algorithms such as A* must necessarily explore an exponential number of search nodes even under the optimistic assumption of almost perfect heuristic estimators, whose heuristic error is bounded by a small additive constant.

Our results shed some light on the comparatively bad performance of optimal heuristic search approaches in "simple" domains such as GRIPPER. They suggest that in many domains, further improvements in run-time require changes to other parts of the planning algorithm than the heuristic estimator.

The efficiency of optimal planning algorithms based on heuristic search crucially depends on the accuracy of the heuristic function used to guide the search. Often, we are interested in domain-independent heuristics for planning. In order to assess the limitations of domain-independent heuristic planning, it appears interesting to analyse the (in)accuracy of common domain-independent planning heuristics in the IPC benchmark domains. For a selection of these domains, we analytically investigate the accuracy of the h⁺ heuristic, the h^m family of heuristics, and certain (additive) pattern database heuristics, compared to the perfect heuristic h^*. Whereas h⁺ and additive pattern database heuristics usually return cost estimates proportional to the true cost, non-additive h^m and non-additive pattern-database heuristics can yield results underestimating the true cost by arbitrarily large factors.

Landmarks for propositional planning tasks are variable assignments that must occur at some point in every solution plan. We propose a novel approach for using landmarks in planning by deriving a pseudo-heuristic and combining it with other heuristics in a search framework. The incorporation of landmark information is shown to improve success rates and solution qualities of a heuristic planner. We furthermore show how additional landmarks and orderings can be found using the information present in multi-valued state variable representations of planning tasks. Compared to previously published approaches, our landmark extraction algorithm provides stronger guarantees of correctness for the generated landmark orderings, and our novel use of landmarks during search solves more planning tasks and delivers considerably better solutions.

We describe an approach to deriving consistent heuristics for automated planning, based on explicit search in abstract state spaces. The key to managing complexity is interleaving composition of abstractions over different sets of state variables with abstraction of the partial composites.

The approach is very general and can be instantiated in many different ways by following different abstraction strategies. In particular, the technique subsumes planning with pattern databases as a special case. Moreover, with suitable abstraction strategies it is possible to derive perfect heuristics in a number of classical benchmark domains, thus allowing their optimal solution in polynomial time.

To evaluate the practical usefulness of the approach, we perform empirical experiments with one particular abstraction strategy. Our results show that the approach is competitive with the state of the art.

Heuristic search using algorithms such as A* and IDA* is the prevalent method for obtaining optimal sequential solutions for classical planning tasks. Theoretical analyses of these classical search algorithms, such as the well-known results of Pohl, Gaschnig and Pearl, suggest that such heuristic search algorithms can obtain better than exponential scaling behaviour, provided that the heuristics are accurate enough.

Here, we show that for a number of common planning benchmark domains, including ones that admit optimal solution in polynomial time, general search algorithms such as A* must necessarily explore an exponential number of search nodes even under the optimistic assumption of almost perfect heuristic estimators, whose heuristic error is bounded by a small additive constant.

Our results shed some light on the comparatively bad performance of optimal heuristic search approaches in "simple" domains such as GRIPPER. They suggest that in many domains, further improvements in run-time require changes to other parts of the planning algorithm than the heuristic estimator.

The efficiency of optimal planning algorithms based on heuristic search crucially depends on the accuracy of the heuristic function used to guide the search. Often, we are interested in domain-independent heuristics for planning. In assessing the limitations of domain-independent heuristic planning, it appears interesting to analyse the (in)accuracy of common domain-independent planning heuristics in the IPC benchmark domains. For a selection of these domains, we analytically investigate the accuracy of the h⁺ heuristic, the h^k family of heuristics, and certain (additive) pattern database heuristics, compared to the optimal heuristic h^*. Whereas h⁺ and additive pattern database heuristics usually return cost estimates proportional to the true cost, non-additive h^k and non-additive pattern-database heuristics can yield results underestimating the true cost by arbitrarily large factors.

We introduce a novel stochastic local search algorithm for the vertex cover problem. Compared to current exhaustive search techniques, our algorithm achieves excellent performance on a suite of problems drawn from the field of biology. We also evaluate our performance on the commonly used DIMACS benchmarks for the related clique problem, finding that our approach is competitive with the current best stochastic local search algorithm for finding cliques. On three very large problem instances, our algorithm establishes new records in solution quality.

Heuristic search is a leading approach to domain-independent planning. For cost-optimal planning, however, existing admissible heuristics are generally too weak to effectively guide the search. Pattern database heuristics (PDBs), which are based on abstractions of the search space, are currently one of the most promising approaches to developing better admissible heuristics. The informedness of PDB heuristics depends crucially on the selection of appropriate abstractions (patterns). Although PDBs have been applied to many search problems, including planning, there are not many insights into how to select good patterns, even manually. What constitutes a good pattern depends on the problem domain, making the task even more difficult for domain-independent planning, where the process needs to be completely automatic and general. We present a novel way of constructing good patterns automatically from the specification of planning problem instances. We demonstrate that this allows a domain-independent planner to solve planning problems optimally in some very challenging domains, including a STRIPS formulation of the Sokoban puzzle.

Model-checking alternating-time properties has recently attracted much interest in the verification of distributed protocols. While checking the validity of a specification in alternating-time temporal logic (ATL) against an explicit model is cheap (linear in the size of the formula and the model), the problem becomes EXPTIME-hard when symbolic models are considered. Practical ATL model-checking therefore often consumes too much computation time to be tractable.

In this paper, we describe a novel approach for ATL model-checking, which constructs an explicit weak model-checking game on-the-fly. This game is then evaluated using heuristic techniques inspired by efficient evaluation algorithms for and/or-trees.

To show the feasibility of our approach, we compare its performance to the ATL model-checking system MOCHA on some practical examples. Using very limited heuristic guidance, we achieve a significant speedup on these benchmarks.

For many classical planning domains, the computational complexity of non-optimal and optimal planning is known. However, little is known about the area in between the two extremes of finding some plan and finding optimal plans. In this contribution, we provide a complete classification of the propositional domains from the first four International Planning Competitions with respect to the approximation classes PO, PTAS, APX, poly-APX, and NPO.

The 3rd and 4th International Planning Competitions have enriched the set of benchmarks for classical propositional planning by a number of novel and interesting planning domains. Although they are commonly used for the purpose of evaluating planner performance, the planning domains themselves have not yet been studied in depth. In this contribution, we prove complexity results for the decision problems related to finding some plan, finding an optimal sequential plan, and finding an optimal parallel plan in these planning domains. Our results also provide some insights into the question why planning is hard for some of the domains under consideration.

We apply Monte Carlo simulation and alpha-beta search to the card game of Skat, which is similar to Bridge, but different enough to require some new algorithmic ideas besides the techniques developed for Bridge. Our Skat-playing program integrates well-known techniques such as move ordering with two new search enhancements. Quasi-symmetry reduction generalizes symmetry reductions, popularized by Ginsberg's Partition Search algorithm, to search states which are "almost equivalent". Adversarial heuristics generalize ideas from single-agent search algorithms like A* to two-player games, leading to guaranteed lower and upper bounds for the score of a game position. Combining these techniques with state-of-the-art tree search algorithms, our program determines the game-theoretical value of a typical Skat hand (with perfect information) in 10 milliseconds.

Fast Downward is a classical planning system based on heuristic search. It can deal with general deterministic planning problems encoded in the propositional fragment of PDDL2.2, including advanced features like ADL conditions and effects and derived predicates (axioms). Like other well-known planners such as HSP and FF, Fast Downward is a progression planner, searching the space of world states of a planning task in the forward direction. However, unlike other PDDL planning systems, Fast Downward does not use the propositional PDDL representation of a planning task directly. Instead, the input is first translated into an alternative representation called multi-valued planning tasks, which makes many of the implicit constraints of a propositional planning task explicit. Exploiting this alternative representation, Fast Downward uses hierarchical decompositions of planning tasks for computing its heuristic function, called the causal graph heuristic, which is very different from traditional HSP-like heuristics based on ignoring negative interactionse of operators.

In this article, we give a full account of Fast Downward's approach to solving multi-valued planning tasks. We extend our earlier discussion of the causal graph heuristic to tasks involving axioms and conditional effects and present some novel techniques for search control that are used within Fast Downward's best-first search algorithm: preferred operators transfer the idea of helpful actions from local search to global best-first search, deferred evaluation of heuristic functions mitigates the negative effect of large branching factors on search performance, and multi-heuristic best-first search combines several heuristic evaluation functions within a single search algorithm in an orthogonal way. We also describe efficient data structures for fast state expansion (successor generators and axiom evaluators) and present a new non-heuristic search algorithm called focused iterative-broadening search, which utilizes the information encoded in causal graphs in a novel way.

Fast Downward has proven remarkably successful: It won the "classical" (i.e., propositional, non-optimising) track of the 4th International Planning Competition at ICAPS 2004, following in the footsteps of planners such as FF and LPG. Our experiments show that it also performs very well on the benchmarks of the earlier planning competitions and provide some insights about the usefulness of the new search enhancements.

In recent years, heuristic search methods for classical planning have achieved remarkable results. Their most successful representative, the FF algorithm, performs well over a wide spectrum of planning domains and still sets the state of the art for STRIPS planning. However, there are some planning domains in which algorithms like FF and HSP perform poorly because their relaxation method of ignoring the "delete lists" of STRIPS operators loses too much vital information.

Planning domains which have many dead ends in the search space are especially problematic in this regard. In some domains, dead ends are readily found by the human observer yet remain undetected by all propositional planning systems we are aware of. We believe that this is partly because the STRIPS representation obscures the important causal structure of the domain, which is evident to humans.

In this paper, we propose translating STRIPS problems to a planning formalism with multi-valued state variables in order to expose this underlying causal structure. Moreover, we show how this structure can be exploited by an algorithm for detecting dead ends in the search space and by a planning heuristic based on hierarchical problem decomposition.

Our experiments show excellent overall performance on the benchmarks from the international planning competitions.

Fast Downward is a propositional planning system based on heuristic search. Compared to other heuristic planners such as FF or HSP, it has two distinguishing features: First, it is tailored towards planning tasks with non-binary (but finite domain) state variables. Second, it exploits the causal dependency between state variables to solve relaxed planning problems in a hierarchical fashion.

The efficiency of AI planning systems is usually evaluated empirically. For the validity of conclusions drawn from such empirical data, the problem set used for evaluation is of critical importance. In planning, this problem set usually, or at least often, consists of tasks from the various planning domains used in the first two international planning competitions, hosted at the 1998 and 2000 AIPS conferences. It is thus surprising that comparatively little is known about the properties of these benchmark domains, with the exception of BLOCKSWORLD, which has been studied extensively by several research groups.

In this contribution, we try to remedy this fact by providing a map of the computational complexity of non-optimal and optimal planning for the set of domains used in the competitions. We identify a common transportation theme shared by the majority of the benchmarks and use this observation to define and analyze a general transportation problem that generalizes planning in several classical domains such as LOGISTICS, MYSTERY and GRIPPER. We then apply the results of that analysis to the actual transportation domains from the competitions. We next examine the remaining benchmarks, which do not exhibit a strong transportation feature, namely SCHEDULE and FREECELL.

Relating the results of our analysis to empirical work on the behavior of the recently very successful FF planning system, we observe that our theoretical results coincide well with data obtained from empirical investigations.

These days, propositional planning can be considered a quite well-understood problem. Good algorithms are known that will solve a wealth of very different and sometimes challenging planning tasks, and theoretical computational properties of both general STRIPS-style planning and the best-known benchmark problems have been established.

However, propositional planning has a major drawback: The formalism is too weak to allow for the easy encoding of many genuinely interesting planning problems, specifically those involving numbers. A recent effort to enhance the PDDL planning language to cope with (among other additions) numerical state variables, to be used at the third international planning competition, has increased interest in these issues.

In this contribution, we analyze "STRIPS with numbers" from a theoretical point of view. Specifically, we show that the introduction of numerical state variables makes the planning problem undecidable in the general case and many restrictions thereof and identify special cases for which we can provide decidability results.

MIPS was the first general planning system based on model checking methods. It can handle the STRIPS subset of the PDDL language and some additional features from ADL, namely negative preconditions and (universal) conditional effects. At the AIPS 2000 conference, MIPS was one of five planning systems to be awarded for "Distinguished Performance" in the fully automated track.

This short paper gives a brief introduction to BDDs and explains the basic planning algorithm employed by MIPS, using a simple logistics problem as an example.

The efficiency of AI planning systems is usually evaluated empirically. The planning domains used in the competitions of the 1998 and 2000 AIPS conferences are of particular importance in this context. Many of these domains share a common theme of transporting portables, making use of mobiles traversing a map of locations and roads.

In this contribution, we embed these benchmarks into a well-structured hierarchy of transportation problems and study the computational complexity of optimal and non-optimal planning in this domain family. We identify the key features that make transportation tasks hard and try to shed some light on the recent success of planning systems based on heuristic local search, as observed in the AIPS 2000 competition.

The efficiency of AI planning systems is usually evaluated empirically. Some benchmark problems are of particular importance in this context, especially the ones used in the competitions of the planning conferences AIPS '98 and AIPS 2000. Previously, the behaviour of different planning systems on these problems was only used to judge their relative performance. However, it would be interesting to be able to compare their performance to the theoretical optimum.

To this end, we have studied the computational complexity of these benchmark domains. Grouping them into natural hierarchies of "transportation" and "manipulation" problems, we are now able to state which of the problems are difficult to solve and which of them are not, and can also provide some insights regarding the sources of hardness in these domains. Interestingly, some of the results of this work help to understand the recent success of planning systems based on heuristic local search, as observed in the AIPS 2000 competition.

Planning is a central topic of AI and provides solutions to problems given in a problem independent formalism. Recent successes in the exploration of model checking and single-agent search problems have led to a generalization of the symbolic exploration method with binary decision diagrams (BDDs).

In this paper we present the use, architecture, implementation and performance of our STRIPS planner MIPS abbreviating intelligent model checking and planning system. With BDD refinements, symbolic and single state heuristic search engines we highlight recent improvements that have been added to the system.

Diese Studienarbeit befasst sich mit der Konzeption und Implementation eines vollwertigen Planungssystems auf Grundlage von symbolischen Explorationstechniken mithilfe von binären Entscheidungsdiagrammen (BDDs).

Das Planungssystem umfasst einen Parser zum Einlesen von Problemspezifikationen in der Sprache PDDL/STRIPS, ein Modul zur Inferenz einer effizienten binären Zustandskodierung für das spezifizierte Planungsproblem, sowie Module zum Aufbau der Übergangsfunktion und symbolischen Exploration.

In this paper we present a general-purpose algorithm for transforming a planning problem specified in STRIPS into a concise state description for single state or symbolic exploration.

The process of finding a state description consists of four phases. In the first phase we symbolically analyze the domain specification to determine constant and one-way predicates, i.e. predicates that remain unchanged by all operators or toggle in only one direction, respectively.

In the second phase we symbolically merge predicates which leads to a drastic reduction of state encoding size, while in the third phase we constrain the domains of the predicates to be considered by enumerating the operators of the planning problem. The fourth phase combines the result of the previous phases.